Minerva 58 (1):25-45 (2020)

Authors
James Holbrook
Georgia Institute of Technology
Abstract
Should philosophy help address the problems of non-philosophers or should it be something isolated both from other disciplines and from the lay public? This question became more than academic for philosophers working in UK universities with the introduction of societal impact assessment in the national research evaluation exercise, the REF. Every university department put together a submission describing its broader impact in case narratives, and these were graded. Philosophers were required to participate. The resulting narratives are publicly available and provide a unique resource permitting a more comprehensive, empirically based consideration of philosophy’s influence outside the academy than has hitherto been possible. This paper takes advantage of this data to develop a cartography of the ways in which philosophers engage society in their work. We identify five approaches: dissemination, engagement, provocations, living philosophy, and philosophy of X. We compare these along the six dimensions proposed by Frodeman and Briggle to characterize the ideal field philosopher. We conclude that there are multiple ways of being a field philosopher, which vary in their emphasis. This pluralism bodes well for the expansion of philosophy’s societal influence, since there are routes available to suit different preferences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11024-019-09384-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Research Evaluation and the Assessment of Public Value.Jordi Molas-Gallart - 2015 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 14 (1):111-126.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Field Philosophy and Social Justice.Evelyn Brister - forthcoming - Social Epistemology:1-12.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophy Hitherto: A Reply to Frodeman and Briggle.W. Derek Bowman - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (3):85-91.
History of Philosophy and Conceptual Cartography.Nathaniel Goldberg - 2017 - Analytic Philosophy 58 (2):119-138.
The Learning Society and Governmentality: An Introduction.Maarten Simons & Jan Masschelein - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):417–430.
The Learning Society and Governmentality: An Introduction.Jan Masschelein Maarten Simons - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):417-430.
Border Crossings: Dialogue Across and Within Fields and Traditions.Daniel Vokey - 2010 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 19:69-76.
Is Public Philosophy Possible?Steven P. Lee - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):13-18.
Moral Philosophy and the ‘Real World’.Christopher J. Cowley - 2011 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 31 (1):21-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-12

Total views
12 ( #715,418 of 2,326,024 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #214,458 of 2,326,024 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes