Genetically Modified Crops, Inclusion, and Democracy

Perspectives on Science 25 (4):488-520 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The public controversy over genetically modified crops is predominantly framed in terms of concerns over health and safety. Within this framing, the primary point of controversy is whether GM foods are likely to cause bio-physiological injury or disease to human consumers; a secondary issue, but one that still fits within the health and safety framing, is whether the cultivation of GM crops is likely to cause bio-physiological injury or disease to non-target species or ecosystems more broadly. Proponents of the development and...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,326

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-21

Downloads
65 (#264,875)

6 months
28 (#139,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

OPINION PIECE Counterproductive consequences of ‘anti-GMO’ activism.Giovanni Tagliabue - 2018 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 18:61-74.
OPINION PIECE Counterproductive consequences of ‘anti-GMO’ activism.Giovanni Tagliabue - 2018 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 18:61-74.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The ethical project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Science in a democratic society.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.

View all 30 references / Add more references