Is Longino's Conception of Objectivity Feminist?

Hypatia 26 (2):333-351 (2011)
Abstract
Helen Longino's account of objectivity has been highly regarded by both feminist and mainstream philosophers of science. However, I have encountered three feminist philosophers who have all offered one especially compelling feminist critique of Longino's view: far from vindicating or privileging the work of feminist scientists, Longino's account actually requires the active cultivation of anti-feminist and misogynist scientists to balance out the possibility of feminist bias. I call this objection the Nazi problem, for the particular version that claims that her view requires even the active cultivation of Nazi scientists in objective inquiry. In this paper I consider one response to the Nazi problem, which I call the good faith argument. I show that the good faith argument itself is just as objectionable, on feminist grounds, as the Nazi problem it is meant to address
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01160.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Diversity and the Fate of Objectivity.Karyn L. Freedman - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (1):45-56.
Can There Be A Feminist Science?E. Longino Helen - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):51 - 64.
Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology: Helen E. Longino.Helen E. Longino - 1997 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):19–36.
IV. Longino and Heidegger on Objectivity.Philip Lewin - 1984 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):145-148.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-23

Total downloads

101 ( #50,760 of 2,177,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #112,892 of 2,177,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums