Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):231-247 (1999)

Larry Hickman
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale
This essay argues that "the family" should be understood in functional terms:whatever functions as a family should have the legal status of a family. Theauthor's argument thus avoids two extreme positions. The first is the position ofthe hard-line "platonic" essentialists who, on grounds of nature, supernature, orcultural history, argue that a family unit must comprise heterosexual partners.The second is the position of the radical relativist, who argues that there are noessences whatsoever or that essences are purely arbitrary. Treating the family infunctionalist terms, the author argues, would have positive consequences thatwould strengthen the social fabric.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/004839319902900204
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sentiment of Rationality.William James - 1879 - Mind 4 (15):317-346.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey.Charlene Haddock Seigfried - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):207-230.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
53 ( #202,833 of 2,454,813 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,241 of 2,454,813 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes