Sellars, Price, and the Myth of the Given

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8 (7) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wilfrid Sellars's "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" begins with an argument against sense-datum epistemology. There is some question about the validity of this attack, stemming in part from the assumption that Sellars is concerned with epistemic foundationalism. This paper recontextualizes Sellars's argument in two ways: by showing how the argument of EPM relates to Sellars's 1940s work, which does not concern foundationalism at all; and by considering the view of H.H. Price, Sellars's teacher at Oxford and the only classical datum theorist to receive substantive comment in EPM. Timm Triplett has claimed that Sellars's discussion simply begs the question against Price, but this depends on the mistaken assumption that Sellars's concern is with foundationalism. On the contrary, Sellars's argument concerns the assumption that the innate capacity for sensory experience counts as "thinking in presence" in the way needed for empiricist accounts of content acquisition. Price's distinction between noticing universals and being aware of them encapsulates the tensions empiricists face here.

Similar books and articles

Sellars’s Misconstrual of the Defenders of the Given.Timm Triplett - 2014 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 31 (1):79-99.
Wilfrid Sellars. [REVIEW]William A. Rottschaefer - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (1):96-102.
Traditional Empiricism, the Myth of the Given and Self-knowledge.Yakir Levin - 2005 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 8.
Phenomenal character and the myth of the given.Caleb Liang - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:21-36.
Sellars vs. the given.Daniel Bonevac - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):1-30.
Sellars vs. the Given.Daniel Bonevac - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):1-30.
Sellars on Descartes.Christian Barth - 2018 - In Luca Corti & Antonio Nunziante (eds.), Sellars and the History of Modern Philosophy. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 15-35.
The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-11

Downloads
268 (#66,862)

6 months
187 (#11,468)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael R. Hicks
Miami University, Ohio

Citations of this work

What is the myth of the given?James R. O’Shea - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):10543-10567.
The given and the hard problem of content.Pietro Salis - 2022 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-26.
Hicks on Sellars, Price, and the Myth of the Given.Timm Triplett - 2023 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 11 (1).

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Mind and World.John Henry McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The problems of philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - New York: Barnes & Noble.
The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief.David Chalmers - 2003 - In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 220--72.
The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Portland, OR: Home University Library.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.

View all 20 references / Add more references