Responsibility for believing

Synthese 161 (3):357-373 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many assume that we can be responsible only what is voluntary. This leads to puzzlement about our responsibility for our beliefs, since beliefs seem not to be voluntary. I argue against the initial assumption, presenting an account of responsibility and of voluntariness according to which, not only is voluntariness not required for responsibility, but the feature which renders an attitude a fundamental object of responsibility (that the attitude embodies one’s take on the world and one’s place in it) also guarantees that it could not be voluntary. It turns out, then, that, for failing to be voluntary, beliefs are a central example of the sort of thing for which we are most fundamentally responsible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Against Doxastic Compatibilism.Rik Peels - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3):679-702.
Virtue and voluntarism.James Montmarquet - 2008 - Synthese 161 (3):393 - 402.
Room for responsibility: Kant on direct doxastic voluntarism.Christopher Benzenberg - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Debate: The concept of voluntariness.Ben Colburn - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (1):101–111.
Attitudes, Tracing, and Control.Angela M. Smith - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):115-132.
Attitudinal control.Conor McHugh - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2745-2762.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,947 (#2,872)

6 months
485 (#2,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pamela Hieronymi
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

The wrongs of racist beliefs.Rima Basu - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2497-2515.
What We Epistemically Owe To Each Other.Rima Basu - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):915–931.
Opting for the Best: Oughts and Options.Douglas W. Portmore - 2019 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
The Importance of Forgetting.Rima Basu - 2022 - Episteme 19 (4):471-490.

View all 195 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Wrong Kind of Reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (9):437 - 457.

View all 19 references / Add more references