Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458 (2007)
: Establishing and defending the Christian faith serves as both a guide and a limit to Berkeley's intriguing metaphysics. I take Berkeley seriously when he says that his aim is to promote the consideration of God and the truth of Christianity. In this paper I discuss and engage Berkeley's superficially weak argument (which I call the natural analogy argument) in defense of the plausibility of the doctrine of bodily resurrection. When his immaterialist resources are properly applied, the argument has more merit than one might initially believe. I conclude by speculating that Berkeley had reason to believe that immaterialism was a better fit with Christianity than materialism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Locke and Personal Identity: Immortality and Bodily Resurrection in 17th-Century Philosophy.Joanna K. Forstrom - 2010 - Continuum.
Berkeley's Argument for Immaterialism.A. C. Grayling - 2005 - In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press. pp. 166--189.
The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction.Walter R. Ott - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley's Master Argument.Daniele Bertini - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50.
The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley's Immaterialism.James S. Spiegel - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):216-235.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #97,477 of 2,158,363 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,511 of 2,158,363 )
How can I increase my downloads?