Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458 (2007)

: Establishing and defending the Christian faith serves as both a guide and a limit to Berkeley's intriguing metaphysics. I take Berkeley seriously when he says that his aim is to promote the consideration of God and the truth of Christianity. In this paper I discuss and engage Berkeley's superficially weak argument (which I call the natural analogy argument) in defense of the plausibility of the doctrine of bodily resurrection. When his immaterialist resources are properly applied, the argument has more merit than one might initially believe. I conclude by speculating that Berkeley had reason to believe that immaterialism was a better fit with Christianity than materialism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2007.0062
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Berkeley's Philosophy of Religion.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - In Richard Brook & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 458-483.
Berkeleyan Idealism and Christian Philosophy.James S. Spiegel - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (2):e12400.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
94 ( #122,866 of 2,499,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,670 of 2,499,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes