Animals Deserve Moral Consideration


Authors
Scott Hill
University of Colorado, Boulder
Abstract
Timothy Hsiao asks a good question: Why believe animals deserve moral consideration? His answer is that we should not. He considers various other answers and finds them wanting. In this paper I consider an answer Hsiao has not yet discussed: We should accept a conservative view about how to form beliefs. And such a view will instruct us to believe that animals deserve moral consideration. I think conservatives like Hsiao do best to answer his question in a way that upholds the moral status of animals. Since my answer is one Hsiao has not yet addressed, it is compatible with the main points he makes against various other motivations in his many papers on this topic. So my paper should be understood as an invitation to Hsiao to consider another answer.
Keywords Hsiao, Timothy  Animal Ethics  Conservativism  Traditionalism  Revisionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-020-09819-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Animal Rights and Wrongs.Roger Scruton - 2000 - Metro in Association with Demos.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hsiao on the Moral Status of Animals: Two Simple Responses.Timothy Perrine - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5):927-933.
The Moral Status of Animals.Scott David Wilson - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Sentience, Rationality, and Moral Status: A Further Reply to Hsiao.Stephen Puryear - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (4):697-704.
Don’T Be Cruel: The Significance of Cruelty in the Current Meat-Debate.Peter Kaiser - 2018 - In Svenja Springer & Herwig Grimm (eds.), Professionals in food chains. Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 157-162.
Moral Vegetarianism From a Very Broad Basis.David DeGrazia - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):143-165.
Moral Status in Virtue Ethics.John Hacker-Wright - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (3):449-473.
Dürfen wir Tiere essen?Jens Tuider - 2013 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):269-280.
Is Equal Moral Consideration Really Compatible with Unequal Moral Status?John Rossi - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):251-276.
In Defense of Eating Meat.Timothy Hsiao - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):277-291.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-11

Total views
120 ( #73,015 of 2,311,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
120 ( #4,368 of 2,311,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature