Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):97-117 (2014)

Scott Hill
University of Innsbruck
For any essential property God has, there is an ability He does not have. He is unable to bring about any state of affairs in which He does not have that property. Such inabilities seem to preclude omnipotence. After making trouble for the standard responses to this problem, I offer my own solution: God is not omnipotent. This may seem like a significant loss for the theist. But I show that it is not. The theist may abandon the doctrine that God is omnipotent without scaling back the extent of His power and without denying that He has all perfections.
Keywords Ability  Impossible States of Affairs  Perfection  Traditionalism  Revisionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2014.914289
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter van Inwagen - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Are We Free to Break the Laws?David Lewis - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):113-21.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No New Solutions to the Logical Problem of the Trinity.Beau Branson - 2019 - Journal of Applied Logics 6 (6):1051-1092.
From Isolation to Skepticism.Scott Hill - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (3):649-668.
What Are the Odds That Everyone is Depraved?Scott Hill - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3):299-308.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
514 ( #16,862 of 2,499,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #10,198 of 2,499,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes