Normative Conflict in Legal Systems: A Functional Analysis

Dissertation, Washington University (1985)
Abstract
Most legal philosophers who express an opinion on the issue of normative conflict adopt some version of what I call the 'no-conflicts' thesis. They argue that there are no genuine conflicts between the norms of a legal system, that the norms of a legal system are necessarily consistent with one another, or that normative consistency is a rational ideal for legal systems. I argue that both versions of the no-conflicts thesis are mistaken. ;Traditional analyses of normative conflict, based on a misapplication of principles of truth-functional logic to the normative sphere, are overly restrictive: normative conflict is understood as a purely deontic phenomenon. Only deontic norms , so the tradition has it, can conflict. I argue that normative conflict is a wider phenomenon. Non-deontic norms can conflict just as can those falling within the deontic sphere. I argue that a normative conflict arises whenever the interrelations in a group of norms are such that it is impossible for all of the norms in that group to function properly. Modern Conflict of Laws principles, which examine the functions of norms, provide valuable insights into the problem of normative conflict. ;Applying modern Conflict of Laws principles to the problem of normative conflict yields two significant results. First, one can develop a new taxonomy of normative conflict in which "conflict" is the genus and "contradiction", "collision", and "competition" are the species. The second significant result is that the principles which govern the resolution of normative competitions can be applied to normative collisions and even to normative contradictions. A functional analysis of normative conflict provides a better understanding both of what the phenomenon is and how conflicts should be dealt with than is provided by traditional analyses
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Functional Taxonomy of Normative Conflict.H. Hamner Hill - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227-247.
Two Adaptive Logics of Norm-Propositions.Mathieu Beirlaen & Christian Straßer - 2013 - Journal of Applied Logic 11 (2):147-168.
Normative Conflicts in Legal Reasoning.Giovanni Sartor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (2-3):209-235.
The Ring of Gyges: Overridingness and The Unity of Reason.David Copp - 1997 - Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (1):86.
Intracultural Awareness in Legal Language—Silvio Berlusconi's Iconography of Law.Massimo Leone - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):579-595.
Can Tolerance Be Grounded in Equal Respect?Enzo Rossi - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (3):240-252.
Arne Naess, Peace and Gandhi.Johan Galtung - 2011 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):31-41.
The Creation of Normative Facts.C. Heidemann - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (2):263-281.
Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
My notes
Sign in to use this feature