No Place for Ethics: Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States

Fairleigh Dickinson University Press (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In No Place for Ethics, Hill argues the Supreme Court has an overriding obligation to ground its judicial review responsibilities not only in the Constitution but also in ethics, understood as the Constitution's ultimate justification. The text discusses a response to the question basic to all human beings: how should I behave?

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9781683933236   1683933257   1683933230   1683933249
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The constitutional court's decision in the dispute between the supreme court and the judicial commission: Banishing judicial accountability?Simon Butt - unknown
The Position and Authority of Constitutional Court in Constitutional System of the Republic of Indonesia.A. D. Basniwati - 2014 - Jurnal Ius 2 (2).
The United States Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: Gonzales v. Oregon and the Supreme Court's (Re)Turn to Constitutional Theory.Theodore W. Ruger - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):817-820.
Comparing Judicial Activism – Can we say that the US Supreme Court is more Activist than the German Constitutional Court?Garoupa Nuno - 2016 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72 (4):1089-1106.
Living or Dead? Specifics of the Language of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.Izabela Kraśnicka - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 38 (1):123-136.
The Debate on Constitutional Courts and Their Authority between Legal and Political Constitutionalism.Valerio Fabbrizi - 2016 - Philosophica Critica 2 (2):47-70.
Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review.Adrienne Stone - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):1-32.
Terrorism, Emergency Powers, and the Role of the US Supreme Court: An Interview with Neal K. Katyal.Giorgio Bongiovanni Neal K. Katyal - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (4):443-455.
Strate V. a-1 contractors: Intrusion into the sovereign domain of native nations.Angelique EagleWoman - manuscript
Introduction to Anglo-American law & language =.B. Sharon Byrd - 2001 - München: Beck.
Influence of of legal positivism on forming philosophical and legal ideas in decision making by the supreme court of the usa.Ганна Вікторівна Коваленко - 2019 - Вісник Нюу Імені Ярослава Мудрого: Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія 3 (42):126-141.
Connecticut Practice Book, Revision of 1963; Containing Rules and Forms for All State Courts: Supreme Court of Errors, Superior Court, Court of Common Pleas, Circuit Court; with Annotations to Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Supplement, Canons of Professional and Judicial Ethics. Connecticut - 1963 - Commission on Official Legal Publications.
The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability.Theodore W. Ruger - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability.Theodore W. Ruger - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
Addressing judicial activism in the indian supreme court: Towards an evolved debate.Madhav Khosla - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-31

Downloads
7 (#1,356,784)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references