Nuclear Power is Neither Right Nor Wrong: The Case for a Tertium Datur in the Ethics of Technology

Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):583-595 (2014)

Authors
Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University
Abstract
The debate over the civilian use of nuclear power is highly polarised. We argue that a reasonable response to this deep disagreement is to maintain that advocates of both camps should modify their positions. According to the analysis we propose, nuclear power is neither entirely right nor entirely wrong, but rather right and wrong to some degree. We are aware that this non-binary analysis of nuclear power is controversial from a theoretical point of view. Utilitarians, Kantians, and other moral theorists make sharp, binary distinctions between right and wrong acts. However, an important argument speaking in favour of our non-binary analysis is that it better reflects our considered intuitions about the ethical trade-offs we face in discussions of nuclear power. The aim of this article is to make this argument sharp by explaining how it can be rendered compatible with, and supported by, the Capability Approach, which is quickly becoming one of the most influential frameworks for thinking about human development
Keywords Nuclear power  Sustainability  Risk  Degree of moral rightness  Moral theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9452-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,455
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inequality Re-Examined.David Archard & Amartya Sen - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):553.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Energy Scenarios and Justice Towards Future Humans.Anders Melin & David Kronlid - 2019 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:39-54.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Examination of a Moral Argument Against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Need and Safety: The Nuclear Power Debate.Paul B. Thompson - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (1):57-69.
Disarming Nuclear Apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
34 ( #255,450 of 2,272,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #564,953 of 2,272,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature