Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (4):539-554 (2018)

Authors
Daniel Hill
University of Liverpool
Attila Tanyi
University of Tromsø
Stephen K. McLeod
University of Liverpool
Abstract
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law- enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.
Keywords civil entrapment  crime  entrapment  intentions  legal entrapment  proactive law enforcement
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-017-9436-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Legal Entrapment.Andrew Altman & Steven Lee - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1):51-69.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Wrong with Entrapment?Paul M. Hughes - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):45-60.
The Problem with Entrapment.Dan Squires - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2):351-376.
Entrapment as an Intrument in the Course of Making Evidence in Criminal Procedure.Raimundas Jurka - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (1):249-265.
Entrapment in the Net?Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):95-104.
Entrapment Through the Lens of the Actio Libera in Causa.Leo Katz - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):587-595.
Cognitive Psychology, Entrapment, and the Philosophy of Mind.Alan Gauld - 1989 - In The Case for Dualism. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Legal Entrapment.Andrew Altman & Steven Lee - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1):51-69.
Entrapment, Qualified Defences and Codification.David Lanham - 1984 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4 (3):437-454.
Neuroimaging, Entrapment, and the Predisposition to Crime.Carter Snead - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):60 – 61.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-06

Total views
199 ( #43,360 of 2,342,663 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #42,008 of 2,342,663 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes