Time in quantum mechanics: a story of confusion

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (1):29-60 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.10.002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Time in quantum mechanics: a story of confusion.Jan Hilgevoord - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (1):29-60.
Time-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics.K. B. Wharton - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (1):159-168.
Erratum to “Time in quantum mechanics: A story of confusion” [Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36(1) (2005) 29–60]. [REVIEW]Jan Hilgevoord - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):413-.
Time as a Geometric Concept Involving Angular Relations in Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics.Juan Eduardo Reluz Machicote - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (11):1744-1778.
Patching physics and chemistry together.Robert C. Bishop - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):710-722.
Time in Quantum Mechanics.Jan Hilgevoord & David Atkinson - 2001 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press.
Does time-symmetry imply retrocausality? How the quantum world says “Maybe”?Huw Price - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (2):75-83.
The Role of the Observer in Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Paul Sonenthal - unknown
Erratum to “Time in quantum mechanics: A story of confusion” [Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 29–60]. [REVIEW]Jan Hilgevoord - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):413.
Why quantum mechanics?P. T. Landsberg - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (10):969-982.
Implications of quantum theory in the foundations of statistical mechanics.David Wallace - manuscript
Explanation, Emergence, and Quantum Entanglement.Andreas Hüttemann - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (1):114-127.
Semi-Classical Limit and Minimum Decoherence in the Conditional Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Vincent Corbin & Neil J. Cornish - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (5):474-485.
The principles of quantum mechanics.Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac - 1930 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics?Avshalom C. Elitzur, Shahar Dolev & Nancy Kolenda (eds.) - 2005 - Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
31 (#504,675)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Role of Time in Relational Quantum Theories.Sean Gryb & Karim Thébault - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (9):1210-1238.
On Time in Quantum Physics.Jeremy Butterfield - 2013 - In Heather Dyke & Adrian Bardon (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 220–241.
Time and quantum theory: A history and a prospectus.Thomas Pashby - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part A):24-38.
The Pauli Objection.Juan Leon & Lorenzo Maccone - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (12):1597-1608.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Time in Quantum Mechanics.Jan Hilgevoord & David Atkinson - 2001 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press.

Add more references