No scope for scope?

Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (5):515-544 (1997)
The notion of scope as it relates to a model of logical form is discussed. The inability of the accepted definition of scope to account for the contrast between priority scope - the logical priority of different quantifiers & other logical notions via rule ordering - & binding scope - the identification of the connection between variables of quantification & a particular quantifier - is demonstrated. The semantic ambiguity of this dichotomy of scope is explored via examination of donkey sentences. A formal representation of this dichotomy is suggested. The government-binding approach & principle of compositionality that handle scope relations via the logical form is rejected due to the complexity of the mechanism by which syntactic form results in logical forms. A discourse representational approach is also rejected. It is concluded that the interaction of syntax & semantics is instead better represented by a game-theoretical treatment of scope & anaphora. 26 References. T. Rosenberg
Keywords Linguistics   Philosophy of Language   Artificial Intelligence   Computational Linguistics   Semantics   Syntax
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1005346511016
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Intentional Identity Revisited.Ahti Pietarinen - 2001 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (2):147-188.
IF Modal Logic and Classical Negation.Tero Tulenheimo - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (1):41-66.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
State or Process Requirements?Niko Kolodny - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):371-385.
Quantification.Anna Szabolcsi - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Wide or Narrow Scope?John Broome - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):359-370.
Ways of Scope Taking.Anna Szabolcsi (ed.) - 1997 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scope Control and Grammatical Dependencies.Alastair Butler - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):241-264.
The Scope of Rational Requirements.John Brunero - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):28-49.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

40 ( #129,937 of 2,172,023 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,023 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums