“Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here”: On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups
Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):381-393 (2009)
AbstractCorporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an increasingly significant managerial concept, yet the manager as an agent of corporate bureaucracy has been substantially missing from both the analytical and conceptual literature dealing with CSR. This article, which is both interpretative in nature and specific in reference to the U.K. cultural context, represents an attempt at addressing this lacuna by utilising qualitative data to explore the perceptions of managers working in corporations with developed CSR programmes. Exploring managerial perceptions of motives for CSR initiatives, methods of stakeholder engagement, organisational integration of CSR and its impact on managerial work, this study concludes that an instrumental approach dominates, which indicates an external-internal organisational paradox in the design and execution of CSR initiatives
Similar books and articles
Managerial attitudes to social responsibility: A comparative study in india and Britain. [REVIEW]A. Farooq Khan & Adrian Atkinson - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):419-432.
The Primary Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethicality in Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Study.Bruno Dyck Kent Walker - 2014 - Business and Society Review 119 (1):147-174.
Managerial Responsibility as Negotiated Order: A Social Construction Perspective.Loréa Baïada-Hirèche, Jean Pasquero & Jean-François Chanlat - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (S1):17-31.
Convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance in Weak Economies: The case of Bangladesh.Mia Mahmudur Rahim & Shawkat Alam - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4):1-14.
Corporate moral responsibility: What can we infer from our understanding of organisations? [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169.
Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility and Product Perceptions in Consumer Markets: A Cross-cultural Evaluation. [REVIEW]Jaywant Singh, Maria del Mar Garcia de los Salmones Sanchez & Igancio Rodriguez del Bosque - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):597-611.
Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-enron era?Joseph Heath & Wayne Norman - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):247-265.
Stakeholders' Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh.Ataur R. Belal & Robin W. Roberts - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):311 - 324.
Towards a Quantitative Model of Heterogeneity in Stakeholder Expectations of Corporate Responsibility: An Application of Latent Class Analysis.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:251-254.
A reluctant stakeholder? On the perception of corporate social responsibility among european trade unions.Lutz Preuss - 2008 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 17 (2):149–160.
The attitudes of united states and south african managers to corporate social responsibility.Christopher Orpen - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):89 - 96.
Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Scale Development and Validation.Magdalena Öberseder, Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, Patrick E. Murphy & Verena Gruber - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 124 (1):101-115.
Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Divided Corporate Self": The Case of Chiquita in Colombia. [REVIEW]Virginia G. Maurer - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):595 - 603.
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Business Manager: An Ethical Inquiry.David Stephen Cloniger - 1985 - Dissertation, Emory University
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Corporate character, corporate virtues.Geoff Moore - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):99-114.
Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective.Xiaohua Yang & Cheryl Rivers - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (S2):155-169.
Corporate Social Responsibility as a Dynamic Internal Organizational Process: A Case Study.Sharon C. Bolton, Rebecca Chung-hee Kim & Kevin D. O’Gorman - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1):61-74.
Slipstreaming the Larger Boats: Social Responsibility in Medium-Sized Businesses.Lutz Preuss & Jack Perschke - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4):531-551.
Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future.Daniel Laude, Anna Heikkinen, Heta Leinonen, Sybille Sachs & Johanna Kujala - 2022 - Business and Society 61 (5):1136-1196.
References found in this work
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. [REVIEW]Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct.Archie B. Carroll - 1999 - Business and Society 38 (3):268-295.