When to Start Saving the Planet?

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 23 (3) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

People should take immediate action to prevent climate harms. Although intuitive, this claim faces two important problems. First, no individual can avert a climate harm on their own. Second, too few people are typically willing to contribute. In response, I point out that individuals can sometimes help prevent harm to the climate, and I argue that they should take preventive action when the prospect of success is good enough. Furthermore, when too few are willing to contribute, an individual may be required to activate others to increase their number. This serves to increase the prospect of success. Crucially, this prospect may be good enough well before enough people have become willing to engage. It follows that people should start saving the planet soon, if not immediately.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,596

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-29

Downloads
32 (#645,101)

6 months
13 (#206,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Hindriks
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

The problem of insignificant hands.Frank Hindriks - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (3):1-26.
Cooperation – Kantian-style.Jan Willem Wieland - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
The problem of insignificant hands.Frank Hindriks - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (3):829-854.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references