Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):593 – 626 (2005)

The current system of organ procurement which relies on donation is inadequate to the current and future need for transplantable kidneys. The growing disparity between demand and supply is accompanied by a steep human cost. I argue that a regulated market in organs from living vendors is the only plausible solution, and that objections common to opponents of organ markets are defeasible. I argue that a morally defensible market in kidneys from living vendors includes four characteristics: (1) the priority of safety for both vendors and recipients, (2) transparency regarding the risks to vendors and recipients, (3) institutional integrity regarding guidelines for cooperating with kidney vendors, and (4) operation under a rule of law. I conclude with some remarks on remaining problems with this account, and offer some suggestions as to how these problems might be addressed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310500421397
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Constraint, Consent, and Well-Being in Human Kidney Sales.P. M. Hughes - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):606-631.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #97,095 of 2,462,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,852 of 2,462,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes