Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1-2):123-125 (2012)
| Abstract |
We show that a statement HIL, which is motivated by a lemma of Hilbert and close in formulation to Hindman’s theorem, is actually much weaker than Hindman’s theorem. In particular, HIL is finitistically reducible in the sense of Hilbert’s program, while Hindman’s theorem is not
|
| Keywords | Reverse mathematics Pigeonhole Conservation Finitism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00153-011-0257-4 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Partial Realizations of Hilbert's Program.Stephen G. Simpson - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):349-363.
Citations of this work BETA
A Weak Variant of Hindman’s Theorem Stronger Than Hilbert’s Theorem.Lorenzo Carlucci - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (3-4):381-389.
Linear Extensions of Partial Orders and Reverse Mathematics.Emanuele Frittaion & Alberto Marcone - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (6):417-423.
Hindman’s theorem for sums along the full binary tree, $$\Sigma ^0_2$$ Σ 2 0 -induction and the Pigeonhole principle for trees. [REVIEW]Lorenzo Carlucci & Daniele Tavernelli - 2022 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 61 (5):827-839.
Similar books and articles
A Simple Proof and Some Difficult Examples for Hindman's Theorem.Henry Towsner - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (1):53-65.
Hindman's Theorem: An Ultrafilter Argument in Second Order Arithmetic.Henry Towsner - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (1):353 - 360.
Aspekte der frege–hilbert-korrespondenz.Kai F. Wehmeier - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (4):201-209.
David Hilbert. David Hilbert's Lectures on the Foundations of Geometry, 1891–1902. Michael Hallett and Ulrich Majer, Eds. David Hilbert's Foundational Lectures; 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2004. ISBN 3-540-64373-7. Pp. Xxviii + 661. [REVIEW]V. Pambuccian - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):255-277.
Hilbert's 'Verunglückter Beweis', the First Epsilon Theorem, and Consistency Proofs.Richard Zach - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2):79-94.
Otto Hölder's Interpretation of David Hilbert's Axiomatic Method.Mircea Radu - 2013 - Philosophia Scientiae 17 (17-1):117-129.
Dedekind and Hilbert on the Foundations of the Deductive Sciences.Ansten Klev - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):645-681.
The Collapse of the Hilbert Program: Why a System Cannot Prove its Own 1-Consistency (Abstract).Saul A. Kripke - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):229-231.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-10-27
Total views
17 ( #639,437 of 2,520,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,180 of 2,520,891 )
2013-10-27
Total views
17 ( #639,437 of 2,520,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,180 of 2,520,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
