Good reasoning on the Toulmin model

Argumentation 19 (3):373-391 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some solo verbal reasoning serves the function of arriving at a correct answer to a question from information at the reasoner’s disposal. Such reasoning is good if and only if its grounds are justified and adequate, its warrant is justified, and the reasoner is justified in assuming that no defeaters apply. I distinguish seven sources of justified grounds and state the conditions under which each source is trustworthy. Adequate grounds include all good relevant information practically obtainable by the reasoner. The claim must follow from the grounds in accordance with a justified general warrant. If this warrant is not universal, the reasoner must be justified in assuming that no exception-making circumstances hold in the particular case to which it is applied

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,215

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Respondeo: Method and content in casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”.Ben Hamby - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):116-131.
The Uses of Argument in Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):287-301.
Return to Reason.Stephen Edelston Toulmin - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
The priesthood of bioethics and the return of casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):33-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
67 (#180,588)

6 months
2 (#297,972)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?