AbstractThe model-theoretic analysis of the concept of logical consequence has come under heavy criticism in the last couple of decades. The present work looks at an alternative approach to logical consequence where the notion of inference takes center stage. Formally, the model-theoretic framework is exchanged for a proof-theoretic framework. It is argued that contrary to the traditional view, proof-theoretic semantics is not revisionary, and should rather be seen as a formal semantics that can supplement model-theory. Specifically, there are formal resources to provide a proof-theoretic semantics for both intuitionistic and classical logic. We develop a new perspective on proof-theoretic harmony for logical constants which incorporates elements from the substructural era of proof-theory. We show that there is a semantic lacuna in the traditional accounts of harmony. A new theory of how inference rules determine the semantic content of logical constants is developed. The theory weds proof-theoretic and model-theoretic semantics by showing how proof-theoretic rules can induce truth-conditional clauses in Boolean and many-valued settings. It is argued that such a new approach to how rules determine meaning will ultimately assist our understanding of the apriori nature of logic.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
How a Semantics for Tonk Should Be.Andreas Fjellstad - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):488-505.
Weak Disharmony: Some Lessons for Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Bogdan Dicher - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic (3):1-20.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):239-259.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-21.
Subatomic Inferences: An Inferentialist Semantics for Atomics, Predicates, and Names.Kai Tanter - forthcoming - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-28.
Similar books and articles
On Reduction Rules, Meaning-as-Use, and Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz - 2008 - Studia Logica 90 (2):211-247.
The Concept of Logical Consequence: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic.Matthew W. McKeon - 2010 - Peter Lang.
The Idea of a Proof-Theoretic Semantics and the Meaning of the Logical Operations.Heinrich Wansing - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (1):3-20.
Some Problems for Proof-Theoretic Semantics.William R. Stirton - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):278–298.
Proof-Theoretic Semantics for a Natural Language Fragment.Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (6):447-477.