Analysis 65 (1):42–45 (2005)

Authors
Bradley Monton
Wuhan University
Dien Ho
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Abstract
We grant that anthropic reasoning yields the result that we should not expect to be in a small civilization. However, regardless of what civilization one finds oneself in, one can use anthropic reasoning to get the result that one should not expect to be in that sort of civilization. Hence, contra Ken Olum, anthropic reasoning does not conflict with observation.
Keywords anthropic reasoning  inflationary theory  civilization size  infinite universe  Ken Olum
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00521.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1985 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Clarendon Press.
On The Plurality of Worlds.Graeme Forbes - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):222-240.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
304 ( #24,046 of 2,343,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #51,401 of 2,343,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes