Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:574 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Transcranial magnetic stimulation is used to make inferences about relationships between brain areas and their functions because, in contrast to neuroimaging tools, it modulates neuronal activity. The central aim of this article is to critically evaluate to what extent it is possible to draw causal inferences from repetitive TMS data. To that end, we describe the logical limitations of inferences based on rTMS experiments. The presented analysis suggests that rTMS alone does not provide the sort of premises that are sufficient to warrant strong inferences about the direct causal properties of targeted brain structures. Overcoming these limitations demands a close look at the designs of rTMS studies, especially the methodological and theoretical conditions which are necessary for the functional decomposition of the relations between brain areas and cognitive functions. The main points of this article are that TMS-based inferences are limited in that stimulation-related causal effects are not equivalent to structure-related causal effects due to TMS side effects, the electric field distribution, and the sensitivity of neuroimaging and behavioral methods in detecting structure-related effects and disentangling them from confounds. Moreover, the postulated causal effects can be based on indirect effects. A few suggestions on how to manage some of these limitations are presented. We discuss the benefits of combining rTMS with neuroimaging in experimental reasoning and we address the restrictions and requirements of rTMS control conditions. The use of neuroimaging and control conditions allows stronger inferences to be gained, but the strength of the inferences that can be drawn depends on the individual experiment’s designs. Moreover, in some cases, TMS might not be an appropriate method of answering causality-related questions or the hypotheses have to account for the limitations of this technique. We hope this summary and formalization of the reasoning behind rTMS research can be of use not only for scientists and clinicians who intend to interpret rTMS results causally but also for philosophers interested in causal inferences based on brain stimulation research.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.586448 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference.Judea Pearl - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):201-202.
Dissociations in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience.Edouard Machery - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (4):490-518.
The Neural Crossroads of Psychiatric Illness: An Emerging Target for Brain Stimulation.Jonathan Downar, Daniel M. Blumberger & Zafiris J. Daskalakis - 2016 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (2):107-120.
Rethinking the Role of Sham TMS.Felix Duecker & Alexander T. Sack - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Subjective Discomfort of TMS Predicts Reaction Times Differences in Published Studies.Nicholas Paul Holmes & Lotte Meteyard - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
View all 7 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Introducing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and its Property of Causal Inference in Investigating Brain-Function Relationships.D. Schutter, J. van Honk & Jaak Panksepp - 2004 - Synthese 141 (2):155-73.
Introducing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and its Property of Causal Inference in Investigating Brain-Function Relationships.Dennis J. L. G. Schutter, Jack Van Honk & Jaak Panksepp - 2004 - Synthese 141 (2):155-173.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Depression.Thomas E. Schlaepfer, Markus Kosel & Hans-Ulrich Fisch - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (2):111-127.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies of Face Processing.David Pitcher, Vincent Walsh & Bradley Duchaine - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 367.
Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Mood in Healthy Subjects.Virginie Moulier, Christian Gaudeau-Bosma, Clémence Isaac, Anne-Camille Allard, Noomane Bouaziz, Djedia Sidhoumi, Sonia Braha-Zeitoun, René Benadhira, Fanny Thomas & Dominique Januel - 2016 - Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology 6.
Children's Causal Inferences From Indirect Evidence: Backwards Blocking and Bayesian Reasoning in Preschoolers.Alison Gopnik - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (3):303-333.
Causal Bayes Nets as Psychological Theories of Causal Reasoning: Evidence From Psychological Research.York Hagmayer - 2016 - Synthese 193 (4):1107-1126.
Cortical Excitability in Patients with Focal Epilepsy: A Study with High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS).Francesca Gilio, Elisa Iacovelli, Maria Gabriele, Elena Giacomelli, Cinzia Lorenzano, Floriana Picchiorri, Anna M. Cipriani, Maria T. Faedda & Maurizio Inghilleri - 2008 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 1 (1):28-32.
Case Selection and Causal Inferences in Qualitative Comparative Research.Thomas Plümper, Vera Troeger & Eric Neumayer - 2019 - PLoS ONE 14 (7).
The Causal Structure of Utility Conditionals.Jean-François Bonnefon & Steven A. Sloman - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (1):193-209.
Neurodisruption of Selective Attention: Insights and Implications.Christopher D. Chambers & Jason B. Mattingley - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (11):542-550.
Randomization and Rules for Causal Inferences in Biology: When the Biological Emperor (Significance Testing) Has No Clothes.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2011 - Biological Theory 6 (2):154-161.
Superordinate Principles in Reasoning with Causal and Deontic Conditionals.K. I. Manktelow & N. Fairley - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (1):41 – 65.
Causal Discovery and the Problem of Psychological Interventions.Markus I. Eronen - 2020 - New Ideas in Psychology 59:100785.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-01-03
Total views
137 ( #85,172 of 2,505,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #33,293 of 2,505,786 )
2021-01-03
Total views
137 ( #85,172 of 2,505,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #33,293 of 2,505,786 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads