Authors
Joshua P. Hochschild
Mount St. Mary's University
Abstract
What role does Scotus‘s understanding of univocity play in Cajetan‘s development of a theory of analogy? In this paper I examine three relevant texts from Cajetan (question 3 of his commentary on Aquinas‘s De Ente et Essentia, his treatise De Nominum Analogia, and his commentary on question 13, article 5 of Aquinas‘s Summa Theologiae) in which Cajetan articulates his understanding of analogy at least in part through dialectical engagement with Scotus‘s arguments about univocity.
Keywords Scotus  Cajetan  Thomas Aquinas  analogy  univocity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's de Nominum Analogia (Review).Jennifer Hart Weed - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):121-122.
Duns Scotus’ Univocity: Applied to the Debate on Phenomenological Theology.Guus H. Labooy - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):53-73.
Duns Scotus and Analogy: A Brief Note.Richard Cross - 2012 - Modern Schoolman 89 (3/4):147-154.
The Analogy of Being in the Scotist Tradition.Garrett R. Smith - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4):633-673.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-20

Total views
42 ( #244,019 of 2,421,645 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #50,541 of 2,421,645 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes