Behavior and Philosophy 37:165 - 180 (2009)
Abstract |
In an earlier essay in this journal, the estimable John Staddon charges B. F. Skinner and E. O. Wilson with committing several fallacies while promoting evolutionary ethics. The present essay replies that what Staddon regards as fallacies are signal contributions to a naturalistic understanding of ethical choice and language
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Values: A Reply to Staddon's "Faith and Goodness".Max Hocutt - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:187 - 194.
Faith and Goodness: A Reply to Hocutt.J. E. R. Staddon - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:181 - 185.
Theoretical Behaviorism Meets Embodied Cognition: Two Theoretical Analyses of Behavior.Fred Keijzer - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):123-143.
Intuition as a Basic Source of Moral Knowledge.Thomas W. Smythe & Thomas G. Evans - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (2):233-247.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-09-17
Total views
13 ( #716,798 of 2,410,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,644 of 2,410,616 )
2013-09-17
Total views
13 ( #716,798 of 2,410,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,644 of 2,410,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads