Philosophy of Science 48 (3):386-399 (1981)
The paper considers recent proposals by Armstrong, Dretske, and Tooley that revive the view that statements of laws of nature are grounded by the existence of higher order facts relating universals. Several objections to such a view are raised and an alternative analysis, recognizing general facts, is considered. Such an alternative is shown to meet a number of the objections raised against the appeal to higher order facts and it is also related to views of Hume and Wittgenstein. Further objections are then raised to all the non-Humean "realist" attempts to provide special facts to ground the laws of nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: Reinhardt Grossmann – David M. Armstrong Metaphysical Correspondence – Edited by Javier Cumpa and Erwin Tegtmeier.Herbert Hochberg - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):447-451.
Similar books and articles
The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Foundations of Science 10 (4):353-70.
The Metaphysical Necessity of Natural Laws.Quentin Smith - 1996 - Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 18:104-23.
The Dretske–Tooley–Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem.Joan Page`S. - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227-243.
The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem.Joan Pag - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227 – 243.
The Nature of Natural Laws.Chris Swoyer - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):203 – 223.
Essentialism and the Necessity of the Laws of Nature.Alice Drewery - 2005 - Synthese 144 (3):381-396.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads125 ( #38,882 of 2,172,656 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,656 )
How can I increase my downloads?