Richard P. Haynes, animal welfare: Competing conceptions and their ethical implications [Book Review]

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy   Plant Sciences   Theory of Medicine/Bioethics   Agricultural Economics   Evolutionary Biology   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-008-9143-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Are Animals Capable of Deception or Empathy?S. Kuczaj, K. Tranel, M. Trone & H. Hamner Hill - 2001 - Implications for Animal Consciousness and Animal Welfare. Animal Welfare Supplement 10.
Ethics and Farm Animal Welfare.J. F. Hurnik & Hugh Lehman - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (4):305-318.
Animal Welfare.C. R. W. Spedding - 2000 - Earthscan Publications.
Do Regulators of Animal Welfare Need to Develop a Theory of Psychological Well-Being?Richard P. Haynes - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):231-240.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
25 ( #208,302 of 2,192,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,023 of 2,192,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature