The bell curve case for heredity

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):389-415 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

City College of New York The hereditarian theory of race differences in IQ was briefly revived with the appearance of The Bell Curve but then quickly dismissed. The authors attempt a defense of it here, with an eye to conceptual and logical issues of special interests to philosophers, such as alleged infirmities in the heritability concept. At the same time, some relevant post-Bell Curve empirical data are introduced.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bell Curve? What Bell Curve?Paul Horwitz - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (2):204 - 206.
Forster and Sober on the curve-fitting problem.André Kukla - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):248-252.
"The Bell Curve" and the New Social Darwinism.Barton Meyers - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (2):195 - 204.
Prenates, postmorts, and bell-curve dignity.Stephen Bates - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (4):pp. 21-25.
Jacobs, equal opportunity, and the bell curve: A critique.L. D. Keita - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (2):247-251.
The bell curve and heredity: A reply to Hocutt and Levin.L. D. Keita - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):386-394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#254,871)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The bell curve and heredity: A reply to Hocutt and Levin.L. D. Keita - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):386-394.
Reply to Keita.Michael Levin & Max Hocutt - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):395-403.

Add more citations