- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Critical commentary on P. Johnson-Laird and R. Byrne,'Deduction'
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):353 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Deduction by children and animals: Does it follow the Johnson-Laird & Byrne model?Hank Davis - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):344-344.
Mental model theory and pragmatics.Jean-Baptiste van der Henst - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):283-284.
Utility and deontic reasoning: Some comments on Johnson-Laird and Byrne.K. I. Manktelow & D. E. Over - 1992 - Cognition 43 (2):183-188.
Paralogical reasoning: Evans, Johnson-Laird, and Byrne on liar and truth-teller puzzles.Lance J. Rips - 1990 - Cognition 36 (3):291-314.
Suppositions, extensionality, and conditionals: A critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002).Jonathan St B. T. Evans, David E. Over & Simon J. Handley - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):1040-1052.
Could it be the case that if I am right my opponents will be pleased? A rejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Byrne and girotto.Guy Politzer - 2009 - Topoi 28 (1):81-85.
Tractability considerations in deduction.James M. Crawford - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):343-343.
Why study deduction?Kathleen M. Galotti & Lloyd K. Komatsu - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):350-350.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-29
Downloads
19 (#961,136)
6 months
8 (#429,418)
2014-03-29
Downloads
19 (#961,136)
6 months
8 (#429,418)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The erotetic theory of reasoning: Bridges between formal semantics and the psychology of deductive inference.Philipp Koralus & Salvador Mascarenhas - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):312-365.
A little logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning.Keith Stenning & Michiel van Lambalgen - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):481-529.
x2. Cantor's proof. The authors of these papers—henceforth let me call them just the authors—seem to have read Cantor's argument in a variety of places. In my records only one author refers directly to Cantor's own argument [7]. One quotes Russell's 'Principles of mathematics'[20] later. [REVIEW]Wilfrid Hodges - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):1-16.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5d8df9484f-nsbkm uwo