Can the beast be tamed?: Reflections on John McMurtry's unequal freedoms: The global market as an ethical system [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):71 - 78 (2001)
My paper responds to certain themes of Professor John McMurtry's recent book, Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System. Although I am in general sympathy with McMurtry's penetrating critique of conventional market theory and practice, I find Unequal Freedoms ambivalent on the critical question of whether endorsing and enacting the life-value code McMurtry proposes would require only a mitigation of the principles and definitive activities of the competitive market system or whether significant reforms within the system would have to be deep structural ones. It is argued that the second alternative is inescapable. I defend my perspective from the point of view of a philosophical analysis of orthodox or neo-classical theory-construction about the competitive market order. In particular, I examine three fundamental principles of such modelling: the maximization of the satisfaction of self-interest, the unboundedness of consumer desire for material goods, and the distribution of monetized wealth. In order for McMurtry's "civil commons" to survive, the practice of each of these principles would need to be radically modified. However, in doing so, competitive capitalism would lose its essential identity as a socio-economic order.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a Must for Public Pension Funds – Because There is No Better Alternative.S. Prakash Sethi - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (2):99 - 129.
Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a Must for Public Pension Funds? Because There is No Better Alternative.S. Prakash Sethi - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (2):99-129.
Thinking and Acting Outside the Neo-Classical Economic Box: Reply to McMurtry.Bernard Hodgson - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (3):289-303.
Similar books and articles
A Free-Market Model for Media Ethics: Adam Smith's Looking Glass.Lawrence Souder - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):53 – 64.
John McMurtry, Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System.Reviewed by Andrew Levine - 2000 - Ethics 110 (2).
Circles Within a Circle: The Condition for the Possibility of Ethical Business Institutions Within a Market System. [REVIEW]Robert Elliott Allinson - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):17-28.
Behind Global System Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of Economic Rationality. [REVIEW]John McMurtry - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):49-60.
Education and the Market Model.John Mcmurtry - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 25 (2):209–217.
The Contradictions of Free Market Doctrine: Is There a Solution? [REVIEW]John McMurtry - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (7):645-662.
The Life-Blind Structure of the Neoclassical Paradigm: A Critique of Bernard Hodgson's "Economics as a Moral Science". [REVIEW]John McMurtry - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):377-389.
Why the Protestors Are Againstcorporate Globalization.John McMurtry - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):201 - 205.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #191,761 of 2,152,457 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,788 of 2,152,457 )
How can I increase my downloads?