Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies: A reply to Kacprzak and Yaskorska

Argumentation 28 (3):371-377 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note comments on the paper ‘Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies’ by Kacprzak and Yaskorska (this issue). Points discussed include the use of the notions of ‘claiming’, ‘conceding’ and ‘commitment’, and the role of Lorenzen dialogues as a device for checking whether a proposition is a tautology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):71-87.
The Coherence of Hamblin’s Fallacies.Ralph Johnson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):305-317.
Abstract models for dialogue protocols.Raquel Fernández & Ulle Endriss - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):121-140.
Woods on Ideals of Rationality in Dialogue.Jim Mackenzie - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):409-417.
What Hamblin’s Book Fallacies was About.Jim Mackenzie - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):262-278.
Dialogue Foundations.Wilfrid Hodges & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75:17-49.
Dialogue theory for critical thinking.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (2):169-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-28

Downloads
12 (#1,054,764)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
Logic and games.Wilfrid Hodges - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 references / Add more references