The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):489-492 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we outline and defend the concept of voluntary non-directed postmortem sperm donation. This approach offers a potential means of increasing the quantity and heterogeneity of donor sperm. This is pertinent given the present context of a donor sperm shortage in the UK. Beyond making the case that it is technically feasible for dead men to donate their sperm for use in reproduction, we argue that this is ethically permissible. The inability to access donor sperm and the suffering this causes, we argue, justifies allowing access to sperm donated after death. Moreover, it is known that individuals and couples have desires for certain sperm donor characteristics which may not be fulfilled when numbers of sperm donors are low. Enacting these preferences contributes significantly to the well-being of intended parents, so we argue that this provides apro tantoreason for respecting them. Finally, we explore the benefits and possible disadvantages of such a system for the various parties affected.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Woman wants dead fiance's baby: who owns a dead man's sperm.M. Spriggs - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):384-388.
Sperm Donation and the Right to Privacy.Oliver Hallich - 2017 - The New Bioethics 23 (2):107-120.
The moral complexity of sperm donation.Rivka Weinberg - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (3):166–178.
Sperm donor suffers years later from inherited disease.D. O. E. Gebhardt - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):213-214.
Anonymous Sperm Donation.Shari Collins & Eric Comerford - 2012 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):213-230.
Danish sperm donors and the ethics of donation and selection.Alison Wheatley - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):227-238.
Sperm, Clinics, and Parenthood.Reuven Brandt - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (8):618-627.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-30

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Parker
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

The complex case of Ellie Anderson.Joona Räsänen & Anna Smajdor - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (4):217-221.
Non-directed postmortem sperm donation: some questions.Frederick Kroon & Ben Kroon - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (4):261-262.
Balancing rules in postmortem sperm donation.Guido Pennings - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (4):270-271.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shaping future children: Parental rights and societal interests.Dan W. Brock - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (4):377–398.
Shaping Future Children: Parental Rights and Societal Interests.Dan W. Brock - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (4):377-398.
Ethical Problems with Ethnic Matching in Gamete Donation.Hane Htut Maung - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):112-116.

Add more references