Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):359-386 (2001)

Abstract
: The gene patenting debate, which proved to be a focal point for divergent moral concerns about recent developments in genome research and biotechnology, has revealed that the moral status of DNA is not clear. One of the arguments used to stop undesirable developments was that DNA possesses a unique status, which renders it unfit for patenting. This paper investigates the allegedly unique (moral) status of genetic material and the information it holds from different perspectives. Several properties of DNA prove to be unique. We examine the relevance of these for patentability of genes and conclude that only the unique symbolic meaning of DNA is a relevant factor, which should be taken into account but weighed against other interests involved
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2001.0030
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Status, Speciesism, and Liao’s Genetic Account.Christopher Grau - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):387-96.
Human Gene Patents: Core Issues in a Multi-Layered Debate. [REVIEW]Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):211-221.
How Distinctive is Genetic Information?M. Richards - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):663-687.
How Can You Patent Genes?Rebecca S. Eisenberg - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):3 – 11.
The Ethics of the Economics of Patenting the Human Genome.Marilyn Martone - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1679-1684.
Who €œOwns” Cells and Tissues?Karen Lebacqz - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):353-368.
The Status of Moral Status.Benjamin Sachs - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):87-104.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
48 ( #236,187 of 2,507,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes