Parfit’s Mixed Maxim Objection against the Formula of Universal Law Reconsidered

Journal of Value Inquiry 58 (1):13-32 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,026

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Referees.[author unknown] - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (4):509-513.
News.[author unknown] - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):275-285.
News.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (4):589-597.
The concept of value.Kurt Baier - 1967 - Journal of Value Inquiry 1 (1):1-11.
Referees.[author unknown] - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (4):593-595.
News.[author unknown] - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (1):133-147.
News.[author unknown] - 2007 - Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (1):137-146.
The study of value change.Nicholas Rescher - 1967 - Journal of Value Inquiry 1 (1):12-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-30

Downloads
37 (#667,535)

6 months
6 (#698,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Sticker
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Barbara Herman - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (8):414.
Kant's Universal Law Formula Revisited.Sven Nyholm - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (2):280-299.
Thinking about Cases: Applying Kant's Universal Law Formula.Jochen Bojanowski - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1253-1268.
Do We Always Act on Maxims?Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):233-255.

View all 10 references / Add more references