Journal of Philosophy 119 (3):113-143 (2022)

Authors
Daniel Hoek
Virginia Tech
Abstract
Choices confront us with questions. How we act depends on our answers to those questions. So the way our beliefs guide our choices is not just a function of their informational content, but also depends systematically on the questions those beliefs address. This paper gives a precise account of the interplay between choices, questions and beliefs, and harnesses this account to obtain a principled approach to the problem of deduction. The result is a novel theory of belief-guided action that explains and predicts the decisions of agents who, like ourselves, fail to be logically omniscient: that is, of agents whose beliefs may not be deductively closed, or even consistent. (Winner of the 2021 Isaac Levi Prize.)
Keywords Belief  Questions  Decision Theory  Logical Omniscience  Closure  Irrationality  Deduction  Inquiry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/jphil202211938
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
The Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1965 - New York, NY, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Aboutness.Stephen Yablo - 2014 - Princeton University Press.
The Foundations of Arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1953 - Evanston: Ill., Northwestern University Press.
Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Good Guesses.Kevin Dorst & Matthew Mandelkern - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Why We Need a Question Semantics.Ivano Ciardelli - 2021 - In Moritz Cordes (ed.), Asking and Answering: Rivalling Approaches to Interrogative Methods. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto. pp. 15–47.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Minimal Rationality and the Web of Questions.Daniel Hoek - forthcoming - In Dirk Kindermann, Peter van Elswyk & Andy Egan (eds.), Unstructured Content. Oxford University Press.
Practical Irrationality and the Structure of Decision Theory.Joseph Heath - 2003 - In Christine Tappolet & Sarah Stroud (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 251--273.
Narrative Closure.Noël Carroll - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (1):1 - 15.
Explanation and the Theory of Questions.Charles B. Cross - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
Philosophy of Action.Alfred R. Mele - 2003 - In Kirk Ludwig (ed.), Donald Davidson. Cambridge University Press.
On Belief: Aims, Norms, and Functions.C. J. Atkinson - 2018 - Dissertation, Lingnan University
An Approach to Why-Questions.Antti Koura - 1988 - Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report. [REVIEW]Z. B. A. - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (2):362-362.
The Work of the Will.Gary Watson - 2003 - In Sarah Stroud & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality. Oxford Clarendon Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-01-11

Total views
574 ( #14,378 of 2,499,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
574 ( #648 of 2,499,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes