Mind 116 (461):121 - 129 (2007)

Miguel Hoeltje
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Donald Davidson has claimed that for every logical truth 5 of a language L, a theory of meaning for L will entail that S is a logical truth of L. Jim Edwards has argued (2002) that this claim is false if we take 'entails' to mean 'has as a logical consequence. In this paper, I first show that, pace Edwards, Davidson's claim is correct even under this strong reading. I then discuss the argument given by Edwards and offer a diagnosis of where he went wrong.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm121
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Theories of Meaning.Wang Lu - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):83-98.
Truth and Meaning.Robert C. Cummins - 2002 - In Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. pp. 175-197.
A Defense of Derangement.Paul M. Pietroski - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):95 - 117.
Truth and Meaning: In Perspective.Scott Soames - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):1-19.
Truth Theories, Translation Manuals, and Theories of Meaning.Jeff Speaks - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (4):487 - 505.
Theories of Truth and Truth-Value Gaps.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1993 - Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (6):551 - 559.


Added to PP index

Total views
85 ( #108,840 of 2,333,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #48,820 of 2,333,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes