Biases in bioethics: a narrative review [Book Review]

BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-19 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given that biases can distort bioethics work, it has received surprisingly little and fragmented attention compared to in other fields of research. This article provides an overview of potentially relevant biases in bioethics, such as cognitive biases, affective biases, imperatives, and moral biases. Special attention is given to moral biases, which are discussed in terms of (1) Framings, (2) Moral theory bias, (3) Analysis bias, (4) Argumentation bias, and (5) Decision bias. While the overview is not exhaustive and the taxonomy by no means is absolute, it provides initial guidance with respect to assessing the relevance of various biases for specific kinds of bioethics work. One reason why we should identify and address biases in bioethics is that it can help us assess and improve the quality of bioethics work.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward an Ecological Bioethics.Nicolae Morar & Joshua August Skorburg - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (5):35-37.
Pluralism in the Jewish Ethical Tradition.Keenan Davis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):16-18.
The Injustice of Categorical Exclusions during Triage.Ryan Misek - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (3):495-507.
Is the public really irrational about economics?Arjo Klamer - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):327-331.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-07

Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?