GRASP agents: social first, intelligent later

AI and Society 34 (3):535-543 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper urges that if we wish to give social intelligence to our agents, it pays to look at how we acquired our social intelligence ourselves. We are born with drives and motives that are innate and deeply social. Next, as children we are socialized to acquire norms and values and to understand rituals large and small. These social elements are the core of our being. We capture them in the acronym GRASP: Groups, Rituals, Affiliation, Status, Power. As a consequence, economic rationality or logical reasoning do not suffice when it comes to social intelligence. Basic features of our social behaviour, of the kind that one sees early in the lives of children, need to be prominent. These include fear, love, and aggression. They extend to the combination of these drives with basic social clues from the environment such as big and small, good and bad, as well as culture-specific specializations of these. This will make agents respond differentially to inferred attributes such as gender, age, group membership. This level of universality in social intelligence should receive our full attention. The general insights gained can then be re-used in myriad implementations to specific modelling issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intelligent agents as innovations.Alexander Serenko & Brian Detlor - 2004 - AI and Society 18 (4):364-381.
Is there a future for AI without representation?Vincent C. Müller - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (1):101-115.
The Ontology of Social Agency.Frederick Stoutland - 2008 - Analyse & Kritik 30 (2):533-551.
Space and sociality.Jeff Malpas - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):53 – 79.
Theoretical foundations for the responsibility of autonomous agents.Jaap Hage - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):255-271.
A Dilemma for Moral Deliberation in AI.Ryan Jenkins & Duncan Purves - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):313-335.
Parameterizing mental model ascription across intelligent agents.Marjorie McShane - 2014 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (3):404-425.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-26

Downloads
25 (#595,425)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?