Improving Health Care Outcomes through Personalized Comparisons of Treatment Effectiveness Based on Electronic Health Records

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):425-436 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The unsustainable growth in U.S. health care costs is in large part attributable to the rising costs of pharmaceuticals and medical devices and to unnecessary medical procedures. This fact has led health reform advocates and policymakers to place considerable hope in the idea that increased government support for research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments will eventually help to reduce health care expenses by informing patients, health care providers, and payers about which treatments for common conditions are effective and which are not. Comparative effectiveness research has shown in some cases that expensive but commonly used treatments are significantly less effective than relatively inexpensive alternatives. Critics warn, however, that CER will homogenize patient care, limit patient choices, and lead to improper health care rationing and even to the denial of lifesaving treatments.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personal Care in Learning Health Care Systems.Franklin G. Miller & Scott Y. H. Kim - 2015 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (4):419-435.
Confidentiality, Electronic Health Records, and the Clinician.Stuart Graves - 2013 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56 (1):105-125.
Impartiality and disability discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.


Added to PP

16 (#860,839)

6 months
4 (#724,033)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?