Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (2):217-239 (2019)

Authors
Noam Hoffer
Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan
Abstract
In the ‘Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic’ of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant contends that the idea of God has a positive regulative role in the systematization of empirical knowledge. But why is this regulative role assigned to this specific idea? Kant’s account is rather opaque and this question has also not received much attention in the literature. In this paper I argue that an adequate understanding of the regulative role of the idea of God depends on the specific metaphysical content Kant attributes to it in the Critique and other writings. I show that neither a heuristic principle of conceptual systematicity, nor conceiving God as a hypothesis of an intelligent designer, can satisfy the demands of reason to make the unity and necessity of the laws of nature intelligible. Regarding the positive account about the metaphysical content of the idea of God, I support my argument by referring to Kant’s pre-critical discussion of the usefulness of the conception of God for the project of science, and by expounding Kant’s critical account of the necessity of the laws of nature. Thus my account sheds light on the continuity of Kant’s conception of God and his appropriation of his own rationalistic metaphysics.
Keywords Kant  God  Regulative ideas  Laws of nature
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/sjp.12323
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Belief in Kant.Andrew Chignell - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (3):323-360.
Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality.Eric Watkins - 2005 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (3):624-626.
Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being.Andrew Chignell - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):157-192.
Religion and Rational Theology.Immanuel Kant, Allen W. Wood & George di Giovanni - 1996 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (3):559-560.
Kant's Possibility Proof.Nicholas Stang - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (3):275-299.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Regulative Ideal of Systematicity in Kant's Critical Philosophy.Md Abdul Muhit - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Preface: Kant and the Lawfulness of Nature.Michela Massimi - 2014 - Kant-Studien 105 (4):469-470.
Preface: Kant and the Lawfulness of Nature.Michela Massimi - 2014 - Kant-Studien 105 (4):469-470.
Kant’s Regulative Spinozism.Omri Boehm - 2012 - Kant-Studien 103 (3):292-317.
Kant, Hume, and Problems of the Deduction of the Categories.V. V. Vasil'ev - 1996 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 34 (4):51-65.
Kant on Historiography and the Use of Regulative Ideas.Pauline Kleingeld - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):523-528.
Regulative Principles and Regulative Ideas.Gary Banham - 2013 - In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 15-24.
Strawson and Kant on Being 'I'.Jan Kuneš - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (4):493-509.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-17

Total views
194 ( #47,742 of 2,403,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #20,337 of 2,403,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes