Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):651 – 673 (2002)

Abstract
The point of departure for this article is a review of the discussion between Twaddle and Nordenfelt on the concepts of disease, illness, and sickness, and the objective is to investigate the fruitfulness of these concepts. It is argued that disease, illness, and sickness represent different perspectives on human ailment and that they can be applied to analyze both epistemic and normative challenges to modern medicine. In particular the analysis reveals epistemic and normative differences between the concepts. Furthermore, the article demonstrates, against Nordenfelt's claim, that the concepts of disease, illness, and sickness can exist without a general theory of health. Additionally, the complexity of different perspectives on human ailment also explains why it is so difficult to give strict definitions of basic concepts within modern health care.
Keywords DEFINITION  DISEASE  ETHICS  ILLNESS  MEDICINE  SICKNESS
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/jmep.27.6.651.13793
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A New Approach to Defining Disease.Mary Jean Walker & Wendy A. Rogers - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (4):402-420.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
158 ( #74,027 of 2,505,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,975 of 2,505,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes