The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis: FRANK J. HOFFMAN

Religious Studies 18 (2):151-158 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what follows I argue for two interrelated theses: that early Buddhism is not a form of empiricism, and that consequently there is no basis for an early Buddhist apologetic which contrasts an empirical early Buddhism with either a metaphysical Hinduism on the one hand, or with a baseless Christianity on the other

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,405

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
42 (#416,743)

6 months
9 (#647,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank J. Hoffman
West Chester University

Citations of this work

Buddhist functionalism—instrumentality reaffirmed.David Scott - 1995 - Asian Philosophy 5 (2):127 – 149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references