Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):59 - 80 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
I distinguish between three kinds of reliabilism for epistemic justification, namely, pure reliabilism, evidential reliabilism, and reasons reliabilism, and I argue for reasons reliabilism. Pure reliabilism and evidential reliabilism are plagued, most importantly, by the generality problem, and they cannot deal adequately with defeater phenomena. One can avoid these problems only by jettisoning the idea of process reliability. The truth connection ? which is essential for any kind of reliabilism ? has to be provided in an altogether different way, namely, by means of facts in the world which serve as objective reasons (or evidence). So, as reasons reliabilism says, a justified belief has to be anchored in an objective reason which speaks in favor of its truth. Only in this way can intuitions about defeaters be preserved and explained. And reasons reliabilism can avoid the generality problem
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/13869795.2013.738305
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,256
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
What is Justified Belief.Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Gettier For Justification.Frank Hofmann - 2014 - Episteme 11 (3):305-318.
El problema de la justificación del conocimiento básico.María Dolores García Arnaldos - 2019 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 36 (1):243-259.
Is Evidence Normative?Frank Hofmann - 2020 - Philosophia:1-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reliabilism—Modal, Probabilistic or Contextualist.Peter Baumann - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):77-89.
Reliabilism.Alvin Goldman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
You Can Always Count on Reliabilism.Michael Levin - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):607 - 617.
Reliabilism: Holistic or Simple?Jeffrey Dunn - 2012 - Episteme 9 (3):225-233.
From Reliabilism to Virtue Epistemology.Linda Zagzebski - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:173-179.
Skepticism, Reliabilism, and Virtue Epistemology.John Greco - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:139-147.
Reliabilism and Deflationism.James R. Beebe - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):495 – 510.
Reliabilism and Antirealist Theories of Truth.James Beebe - 2007 - Erkenntnis 66 (3):375 - 391.
Agent Reliabilism.John Greco - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:273-296.
Goldman on Evidence and Reliability.Jack C. Lyons - 2016 - In H. Kornblith & B. McLaughlin (eds.), Goldman and his Critics. Blackwell.
Evidential Support, Reliability, and Hume's Problem of Induction.Chris Tucker - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):503-519.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-05

Total views
76 ( #133,110 of 2,419,693 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,235 of 2,419,693 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes