The road from haeckel: The jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origins of “evo-devo” [Book Review]
Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):285-307 (2003)
Abstract |
With Carl Gegenbaur and Ernst Haeckel, inspiredby Darwin and the cell theory, comparativeanatomy and embryology became established andflourished in Jena. This tradition wascontinued and developed further with new ideasand methods devised by some of Haeckelsstudents. This first period of innovative workin evolutionary morphology was followed byperiods of crisis and even a disintegration ofthe discipline in the early twentieth century.This stagnation was caused by a lack ofinterest among morphologists in Mendeliangenetics, and uncertainty about the mechanismsof evolution. Idealistic morphology was stillinfluental in Germany, which prevented a fullappreciation of the importance of Darwinstheory of natural selection for comparativemorphology. Evolutionary morphology andembryology failed to contribute significantlyto the modern synthesis of evolutionarybiology, thereby probably delaying theintegration of developmental biology intomodern evolutionary biology. However, Haeckelsstudent Oscar Hertwig, as well as Victor Franzand Alexej N. Sewertzoff from a youngergeneration, all tried to forge their ownsynthetic approaches in which (inspired byHaeckels work) embryology played an importantrole. Important for all three researchers wereattempts to refine, and sometimes redefine, thebiogenetic law, and to find new scientificexplanations for it (and for the manyexceptions to it). Their research was latermore or less forgotten, and had littleinfluence on the architects of the modernsynthesis. As the relationship betweenevolutionary and developmental biology is nowagain rising in importance in the form ofEvo-Devo, we would like to draw attention tohow this earlier research tradition grappledwith similar questions to those now on theagenda, albeit from sometimes quite differentperspectives.
|
Keywords | biogenetic law embryology Evo-Devo Victor Franz Oscar Hertwig Ernst Haeckel morphology Nikolai A. Sewertzoff |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2004 |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1023988119440 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities 1800-1900.Lynn K. Nyhart & Elias José Palti - 1997 - History of Science 35 (3):114-116.
Bridging the Gap Between Developmental Systems Theory and Evolutionary Developmental Biology†.Jason Scott Robert, Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson - 2001 - Bioessays 23 (10):954-962.
The Disciplinary Breakdown of German Morphology, 1870-1900.Lynn Nyhart - 1987 - Isis 78 (3):365-389.
Hertwig, Weismann, and the Meaning of Reduction Division Circa 1890.Frederick B. Churchill - 1970 - Isis 61 (4):429-457.
View all 16 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Formation of the Theory of Homology in Biological Sciences.Karel Kleisner - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (4):317-340.
Evolution Born of Moisture: Analogies and Parallels Between Anaximander’s Ideas on Origin of Life and Man and Later Pre-Darwinian and Darwinian Evolutionary Concepts. [REVIEW]Radim Kočandrle & Karel Kleisner - 2013 - Journal of the History of Biology 46 (1):103-124.
From Cells to Structures to Evolutionary Novelties: Creating a Continuum.Catherine Anne Boisvert - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (3):211-220.
The Return of Ontogeny: Conflicting Ideals of Natural Order in Recent Evolutionary Biology.Gustavo Caponi - 2007 - Scientiae Studia 5 (1):9-34.
Alexei Sewertzoff and Adolf Naef: Revising Haeckel’s Biogenetic Law.Georgy S. Levit, Uwe Hossfeld & Lennart Olsson - 2015 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (3):357-370.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Evo-Devo Meets the Mind: Toward a Developmental Evolutionary Psychology.Paul E. Griffiths - 2007 - In Roger Sansom & Robert Brandon (eds.), Integrating Evolution and Development: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 195-225.
How Developmental is Evolutionary Developmental Biology?Jason Scott Robert - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):591-611.
How Development Changes Evolution: Conceptual and Historical Issues in Evolutionary Developmental Biology.Stavros Ioannidis - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (4):567-578.
Defending Evo‐Devo: A Response to Hoekstra and Coyne.Lindsay R. Craig - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (3):335-344.
From Developmental Constraint to Evolvability: How Concepts Figure in Explanation and Disciplinary Identity.Ingo Brigandt - 2015 - In Alan C. Love (ed.), Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 305-325.
Evo-Devo, Modularity, and Evolvability: Insights for Cultural Evolution.Simon M. Reader - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):361-362.
Animal Cognition Meets Evo-Devo.R. Allen Gardner - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):699-700.
Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology.Alan C. Love - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):309-345.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
45 ( #226,888 of 2,421,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,380 of 2,421,926 )
2009-01-28
Total views
45 ( #226,888 of 2,421,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,380 of 2,421,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads