Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas

Tobias Hoffmann
Catholic University of America
The article studies the reception of Aristotle’s treatments of voluntariness and decision (EN 3.1–5) in the first three Latin commentaries (two by Albert the Great, one by Thomas Aquinas) that are based on the integral text of the Nicomachean Ethics. In particular, my goal is to examine how Albert’s and Thomas’s non-Aristotelian concepts of the will as a faculty distinct from reason influences their explanations of the Aristotelian account. It is argued that the Dominican commentators emphasize the idea of freedom more than Aristotle did.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aquinas on Mixed Actions.Tianyue Wu - 2019 - Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale 61:45-64.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Aristotelian Commentaries of St. Thomas Aquinas.Leo Elders - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):29-53.
Thomas D'Aquino and Albert His Teacher (1980).James A. Weisheipl - 2008 - In James P. Reilly (ed.), The Gilson Lectures on Thomas Aquinas. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,305,531 of 2,439,394 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,565 of 2,439,394 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes