Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas

The article studies the reception of Aristotle’s treatments of voluntariness and decision (EN 3.1–5) in the first three Latin commentaries (two by Albert the Great, one by Thomas Aquinas) that are based on the integral text of the Nicomachean Ethics. In particular, my goal is to examine how Albert’s and Thomas’s non-Aristotelian concepts of the will as a faculty distinct from reason influences their explanations of the Aristotelian account. It is argued that the Dominican commentators emphasize the idea of freedom more than Aristotle did.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,838
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Ethics.Christopher Kaczor - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):353-378.
The Aristotelian Commentaries of St. Thomas Aquinas.Leo Elders - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):29-53.
Thomas D'Aquino and Albert His Teacher (1980).James A. Weisheipl - 2008 - In James P. Reilly (ed.), The Gilson Lectures on Thomas Aquinas. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
3 ( #785,587 of 2,231,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,071 of 2,231,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature