Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):679-680 (2000)

Abstract
Stanovich & West analyze individual differences with respect to response output (e.g., participants' numerical estimates). They do not analyze the underlying cognitive processes that led to the outputs; they thereby probably misclassify some non-normative responses as normative. Using base rate neglect and overconfidence as examples, I demonstrate the advantages of analyzing cognitive processes further.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x00373435
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,431
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Précis of Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.Peter M. Todd & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):727-741.
The Uncertain Reasoner: Bayes, Logic, and Rationality.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):105-120.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
40 ( #246,620 of 2,374,854 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #161,513 of 2,374,854 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes