Abstract
This article explores the implicit theories of morality, or the conceptions regarding the patterns of stability, continuity and change in moral dispositions, both in lay and academic discourses. The controversies surrounding these conceptions and the fragmentation of the models and perspectives in metaethics and moral psychology endangers the pursuit of adequate operationalizations of morally relevant constructs. The current debate between situationists, who deny that character is an useful concept for understanding human behavior, which is better explained by contextual factors (Doris 1998; Harman 1998) and dispositionists, who advocate the cross-situational stability of traits, is also present in the lay discourse, through the existence of competing commonsense ontological assumptions regarding the mutability or alterability of moral features, namely the implicit theories perspective (Chiu, Dweck, Tong, & Fu 1997). These personal theories are primary suspects in the affective and cognitive reactions to transgressions: the type of attended information in formulating evaluative judgments, the calibration of moral responsibility and blameworthiness, the assignment of retribution or reparatory recommendations to transgressors. In the second part of the study we attempt to advance toward a more fine-grained inspection of these lay beliefs, arguing that the construct of implicit theories of morality, as it is currently treated and measured, tends to be restrictive and oversimplifying.
Keywords dispositionism  folk conceptions of morality  implicit theories  situationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1584-174X
DOI 10.5840/symposion20141215
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Marxism, Metaethics, and Morality.Rodney Gene Peffer - 1985 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Two Theories of Morality.Stuart Hampshire - 1976 - Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Against Moral Response-Dependence.Nick Zangwill - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (3):285 - 290.
Morality and Religion: A Psychological Perspective.Anca Mustea, Oana Negru & Adrian Opre - 2010 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 9 (26):18-35.
Autonomy, Rationality, Morality.Louis Finbarr Groarke - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Morality and Health Care Policy.Bernard Gert - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:203-213.
The Argument From Moral Experience.Don Loeb - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):469-484.
Implicit Versus Explicit: An ACT-R Learning Perspective.Niels A. Taatgen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):785-786.
Implicit Morality.James Cracraft - 2004 - History and Theory 43 (4):31-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-06

Total views
508 ( #10,528 of 2,330,105 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #12,532 of 2,330,105 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes