Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 1 (2):191-221 (2014)
AbstractThis article explores the implicit theories of morality, or the conceptions regarding the patterns of stability, continuity and change in moral dispositions, both in lay and academic discourses. The controversies surrounding these conceptions and the fragmentation of the models and perspectives in metaethics and moral psychology endangers the pursuit of adequate operationalizations of morally relevant constructs. The current debate between situationists, who deny that character is an useful concept for understanding human behavior, which is better explained by contextual factors (Doris 1998; Harman 1998) and dispositionists, who advocate the cross-situational stability of traits, is also present in the lay discourse, through the existence of competing commonsense ontological assumptions regarding the mutability or alterability of moral features, namely the implicit theories perspective (Chiu, Dweck, Tong, & Fu 1997). These personal theories are primary suspects in the affective and cognitive reactions to transgressions: the type of attended information in formulating evaluative judgments, the calibration of moral responsibility and blameworthiness, the assignment of retribution or reparatory recommendations to transgressors. In the second part of the study we attempt to advance toward a more fine-grained inspection of these lay beliefs, arguing that the construct of implicit theories of morality, as it is currently treated and measured, tends to be restrictive and oversimplifying.
Similar books and articles
Do theories of implicit race bias change moral judgments?C. Daryl Cameron, Joshua Knobe & B. Keith Payne - 2010 - Social Justice Research 23:272-289.
Marxism, Metaethics, and Morality.Rodney Gene Peffer - 1985 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
The Implicit Conception of Implicit Conceptions. Reply to Christopher Peacocke.Josefa Toribio - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:115-120.
Two Theories of Morality.Stuart Hampshire - 1976 - Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Can implicit appraisal concepts produce emotion-specific effects? A focus on unfairness and anger.Eddie Mw Tong, Deborah H. Tan & Yan Lin Tan - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):449-460.
Morality and Moral Theory: A Reappraisal and Reaffirmation.Robert B. Louden - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Morality and Religion: A Psychological Perspective.Anca Mustea, Oana Negru & Adrian Opre - 2010 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 9 (26):18-35.
Autonomy, Rationality, Morality.Louis Finbarr Groarke - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Morality and Health Care Policy.Bernard Gert - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:203-213.
Implicit Knowledge: How it is Understood and Used in Feminist Theory.Alexis Shotwell - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (5):315-324.
The Argument from Moral Experience.Don Loeb - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):469-484.
Implicit versus explicit: An ACT-R learning perspective.Niels A. Taatgen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):785-786.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity.Christine Korsgaard - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior.John M. Doris - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them.Joshua Greene - 2013 - New York: Penguin Press.