Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):580-587 (2010)

Abstract
Dialogue with three major Muslim authors shows that Islam can take a positive stance toward human rights while also presenting differing interpretations of the meaning and scope of rights. Because of their subordination of norms reached through reason to those drawn from faith, as well as negative experiences of the impact of Western colonization of parts of the Muslim world, Abul A‘la Maududi and Sayyid Qutb place significant restrictions on rights of conscience. 'Abdolkarim Soroush's positive support for the role of reason in Islamic faith and his less-negative assessment of the West lead him to more vigorous support for the human rights agenda. This study raises the question of whether the humility needed in comparative ethics and the respect for others at the root of human rights are necessarily linked
Keywords Sayyid Qutb  dialogue  virtue  Islam  colonialism  Irene Oh  faith and reason  'Abdolkarim Soroush  human rights  Abul A‘la Maududi  internal pluralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00446.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,687
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry.Amy Gutmann (ed.) - 2001 - Princeton University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-19

Total views
56 ( #183,717 of 2,432,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #466,747 of 2,432,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes