Choosing and rejecting cattle and sheep: changing discourses and practices of (de)selection in pedigree livestock breeding [Book Review]
Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4):533-547 (2011)
AbstractThis paper examines the discourses and practices of pedigree livestock breeding, focusing on beef cattle and sheep in the UK, concentrating on an under-examined aspect of this—the deselection and rejection of some animals from future breeding populations. In the context of exploring how animals are valued and represented in different ways in relation to particular agricultural knowledge-practices, it focuses on deselecting particular animals from breeding populations, drawing attention to shifts in such knowledge-practices related to the emergence of “genetic” techniques in livestock breeding which are arguably displacing “traditional” visual and experiential knowledge’s of livestock animals. The paper situates this discussion in the analytical framework provided by Foucault’s conception of “biopower,” exploring how interventions in livestock populations aimed at the fostering of domestic animal life are necessarily also associated with the imperative that certain animals must die and not contribute to the future reproduction of their breed. The “geneticization” of livestock breeding produces new articulations of this process associated with different understandings of animal life and the possibilities of different modes of intervention in livestock populations. Genetic techniques increasingly quantify and rationalize processes of selection and deselection, and affect how animals are perceived and valued both as groups and as individuals. The paper concludes by emphasizing that the valuation of livestock animals is contested, and that the entanglement of “traditional” and “genetic” modes of valuation means that there are multiple layers of valuation and (de)selection involved in breeding knowledge-practices
Similar books and articles
Dealing with Ambivalence: Farmers' and Consumers' Perceptions of Animal Welfare in Livestock Breeding. [REVIEW]Hein Te Velde, Noelle Aarts & Cees Van Woerkum - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (2):203-219.
Breeding Without Mendelism: Theory and Practice of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the Netherlands 1900–1950. [REVIEW]Bert Theunissen - 2008 - Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):637 - 676.
Dealing with Ambivalence: Farmers' and Consumers' Perceptions of Animal Welfare in Livestock Breeding. [REVIEW]Hein Te Velde, Noelle Aarts & Cees van Woerkum - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (2):203-219.
Not All Animals Are Equal Differences in Moral Foundations for the Dutch Veterinary Policy on Livestock and Animals in Nature Reservations.Katinka Waelbers, Frans Stafleu & Frans W. A. Brom - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):497-515.
Darwin and His Pigeons. The Analogy Between Artificial and Natural Selection Revisited.Bert Theunissen - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (2):179 - 212.
What a Thing, Then, is This Cow...": Positioning Domestic Livestock Animals in the Texts and Practices of Small-Scale "Self-Sufficiency.Lewis Holloway - 2003 - Society and Animals 11 (2):145-165.
Ethical Frameworks and Farmer Participation in Controversial Farming Practices.Sarika P. Cardoso & Harvey S. James - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):377-404.
How to Consider the Value of Farm Animals in Breeding Goals. A Review of Current Status and Future Challenges.H. M. Nielsen, I. Olesen, S. Navrud, K. Kolstad & P. Amer - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (4):309-330.
Intensive Livestock Farming: Global Trends, Increased Environmental Concerns, and Ethical Solutions.Ramona Cristina Ilea - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (2):153-167.
Harnessing Heredity in Gilded Age America: Middle Class Mores and Industrial Breeding in a Cultural Context. [REVIEW]Phillip Thurtle - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (1):43 - 78.
Designer Cows: The Practice of Cattle Breeding Between Skill and Standardization.Cristina Grasseni - 2005 - Society and Animals 13 (1):33-50.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Robotic Milking Technologies and Renegotiating Situated Ethical Relationships on UK Dairy Farms.Lewis Holloway, Christopher Bear & Katy Wilkinson - 2014 - Agriculture and Human Values 31 (2):185-199.
How Do Technologies Affect How We See and Treat Animals? Extending Technological Mediation Theory to Human-animal Relations.Koen Kramer & Franck L. B. Meijboom - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (4):595-611.
The Ethics of Innovations in Genomic Selection: On How to Broaden the Scope of Discussion.F. L. B. Meijboom & K. Kramer - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (2):1-18.
References found in this work
Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-1978.Michel Foucault - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Modest−[email protected]−Millennium.Femaleman−Meets−Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience.Donna Jeanne Haraway - 1997 - Routledge.
The Century of the Gene.Evelyn Fox Keller - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (3):613-615.
Animals as Biotechnology: Ethics, Sustainability and Critical Animal Studies.Richard Twine - 2010 - Earthscan.