Abstract
When William May first wrote Catholic Bioethics and the Gift of Human Life, his position was that to perform a craniotomy on a child to save the mother’s life constitutes a direct abortion and is not justifiable. In later editions, May rejected his earlier position in favor of one he originally argued against, most notably by Germain Grisez. The author maintains that the argu­ments surrounding craniotomies on the unborn are still of major relevance today, because they relate directly to certain controversial techniques used to manage ectopic pregnancies. He also argues that May’s original conclusion ought to be upheld, and that May’s later conclusion places too much weight on the interior intention of the actor and not enough on the act itself.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Catholic Tradition
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1532-5490
DOI 10.5840/ncbq201515469
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Craniotomy Arguments Don't Make It.Robert P. Goodwin - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):79 – 88.
Craniotomy Versus Lethal Self-Defense.Luke Murray - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (4):611-616.
Original Sin and a Broad Free Will Defense.W. Paul Franks - 2012 - Philosophia Christi 14 (2):353–371.
Human Embryos in the Original Position?Russell Disilvestro - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):285 – 304.
Liberal Presumptions: A Response to Curtis.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (3):341-47.
A Defense of the Maximin Principle in Rawls' Theory of Justice.Robert C. Robinson - 2009 - Humanity and Social Science Journal 4 (2):175-179.
Reason in Context.David B. Hershenov - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:77-87.
The ‘I’M Personally Opposed to Abortion But...’ Argument.David B. Hershenov - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:77-87.
Forbidding Intentional Mutilation: Some Unintended Consequences?Heidi M. Giebel - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):467-476.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
29 ( #350,062 of 2,386,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #554,109 of 2,386,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes